SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(HP) 2292

SURESHWAR THAKUR
H. P. S. E. B. – Appellant
Versus
Lal Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Sureshwar Thakur, J.

The hereinafter extracted references, stood, transmitted to the Labour Court-cumindustrial Tribunal, Dharamshala (for short “the Labour Court”) hence for an apt answer being meted thereon:-

in CWP No. 432 of 2016

“Whether termination of the services of Sh. Lal Singh S/o Sh Narain Singh R/o Village Sihri, P.O Gohar, Tehsil Chachot, Distt. Mandi, H.P. by the Sr. Executive Engineer, HPSEB (Elect.) Division Gohar, Distt. Mandi (H.P.) w.e.f 16.3.2000 without issuing charge sheet without conducting enquiry and without complying with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is legal and justified? If not, what amount of back wages, seniority, past service benefits, the above workers are entitled to from the above employer?”

in CWP No. 1104 of 2016

“Whether verbal termination of the services of Shri Bhim Singh S/o Shri Natoram Singh, w.e.f 25.5.1999 by the Executive Engineer, HPSEB, Electrical Division, Mandi, H.P without serving notice, without conducting enquiry and without following the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as alleged by workman, is legal and justified? If not, to what back wages, service benefits and relief the above nam

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top