RAJIV SHARMA
Satish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Shakuntla Devi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rajiv Sharma, J.
This FAO is directed against the judgment dated 14.8.2013, rendered by the learned Addl. District Judge (III), Kangra at Dharamshala, in HMA Petition No. 7-N/III/06.
2. Key facts, necessary for the adjudication of this appeal are that the appellant has filed the petition under Section 13 (1) (ia) & (ib), of the Hindu marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of marriage on the grounds of desertion and cruelty. The marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnized on 7.10.2002 according to Hindu rites, customs and ceremonies. The respondent resided with the appellant only for about 15 days and thereafter she went to the house of her parents. The respondent started behaving indifferently with the petitioner and she insisted not to stay with him as her marriage was not solemnized with her consent by her parents. The appellant tried to make the respondent understand, but she did not adhere to the appellant. He had also gone on 2.3.2003 and 6.7.2003 to the respondent to bring her back. The parents of the respondent wanted to keep the appellant as 'Khana Damad’ in their house. However, the appellant refused to do so. The respondent subjected the appellant
Bipinchandra Jaisinghbai Shah versus Prabhavati
Lachman Utamchand Kirpalani versus Meena alias Mota
Smt. Rohini Kumari versus Narendra Singh
Shobha Rani v. Madhukar Reddi AIR 1988 SC 121
Samar Ghosh vs. Jaya Ghosh (2007) 4 SCC 511
Ravi Kumar vs. Julumidevi (2010) 4 SCC 476
Pankaj Mahajan vs. Dimple Alias Kajal (2011) 12 SCC 1
Vishwanath Agrawal vs. Sarla Vishwanath Agrawal (2012) 7 SCC 288
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.