SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(HP) 1705

RAJIV SHARMA
Pushpa Devi – Appellant
Versus
Om Parkash – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Anand Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Rajiv Sharma, Judge:

This appeal has been instituted against Judgment dated 31.5.2008 rendered by learned Presiding Officer/Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Hamirpur, District Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh in HMA Petition No. 49/2004/RBT No. 37/2005.

2. ?Key facts" necessary for the adjudication of the present appeal are that respondent has instituted a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of marriage between the parties by way of a decree of divorce against appellant. Marriage between the parties was solemnised on 10.2.2000 as per Hindu rites and customs. Appellant started misbehaving with the respondent and her in-laws. She gave beatings to the mother of the respondent. She used abusive language against father of the respondent. Matter was also reported to the Gram Panchayat, Jol Sapar and also police station Nadaun. Father of the respondent also filed a complaint before Superintendent of Police, Hamirpur complaining about the mis-behaviour of the appellant towards the respondent. Appellant also filed a complaint under Section 498-A/34 IPC against the respondent and his parents. She deserted him in the month of October, 2001.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top