SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(HP) 1669

RAJIV SHARMA
Suraj Kumar Walia – Appellant
Versus
Punam Walia – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Karan Singh Kanwar.
For the Respondents: Nemo.

JUDGMENT :

Rajiv Sharma, J.

This petition is instituted against the order dated 14.11.2014 rendered by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Court No. 1, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P., in Civil Suit No. 55/1 of 09/08.

2. Key facts, necessary for the adjudication of this petition are that the petitioner-plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the “plaintiff” for convenience sake) has instituted a Civil Suit bearing No. 55/1 of 2009 against the respondents-defendants (hereinafter referred to as the “defendants” for convenience sake) for declaration to the effect that the Will and General Power of Attorney dated 4.2.2003, registered in the office of Sub-Registrar, Paonta Sahib on 4.2.2003 by late Sh. Dalip Singh Walia was null and void and any sale or transfer made on the basis of alleged Will and General Power of Attorney, particularly the property comprised of double storey building consisting of residential house-cum-7 shops etc. bearing M.C. Patiala (Pb.) No. 302/1 to 309/1 situated at Gau-Shala Road Patiala, Panjab or any other transactions made by defendants on the basis of such documents be declared null and void and not binding upon the plaintiffs and the property subsequentl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top