SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(HP) 1730

RAJIV SHARMA
Dhanwant Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ram Nath – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Suneet Goel.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Devyani Sharma.

JUDGMENT :

RAJIV SHARMA, J.

1. This regular second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the learned District Judge, Solan, H.P., (Camp at Nalagarh), dated 16.12.2008, passed in Civil Appeal No. 11NL/13 of 08/07.

2. “Key facts” necessary for the adjudication of this regular second appeal are that the appellants-plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs), have instituted suit for declaration and for possession as coparceners and permanent prohibitory injunction against the respondents-defendants (hereinafter referred to as the defendants). According to the averments made in the plaint, the land measuring 36 bighas 3 biswas, fully described in the plaint, as entered in copy of jamabandi for the year 1994-95, is situated in the village Kaundi, H.B. No. 416, Pargana Kharampur, Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, H.P., (hereinafter referred to as the suit land). The plaintiffs and defendants No. 3 & 4 are Hindu Rajput and constitute joint Hindu Mitakshra Coparcenary Family. The pedigree table was also reproduced in the plaint. The property was previously owned by the common ancestor Ganga Ram. He died on 1.2.1951 and suit land was inherited by Banarsi Dass, son of Ga

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top