SURESHWAR THAKUR
Dev Raj – Appellant
Versus
Sandhya Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sureshwar Thakur, J.
The respondent herein had instituted a complaint against the complainant/petitioner herein before the State Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau, Solan qua the complainant/petitioner herein demanding illegal gratification for meteing transport expenses for visiting various places for verifying the position, status and tagging of cows purchased by the members of Self Help Group, Badhal, headed by the respondent herein. Consequently, FIR No. 11 of 2010 of 21.06.2010 stood registered against the complainant/petitioner herein constituting therein commission of offences by him under Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. In sequel to the registration of the FIR, the complainant/petitioner herein faced prosecution before the learned Special Judge, Solan. The Charge for which he came to be tried stood concluded by the learned Special Judge, Solan to remain unsubstantiated whereupon it pronounced an order acquitting the accused/complainant/ petitioner herein. In an appeal carried therefrom by the State of Himachal Pradesh before this Court, this Court pronounced a judgment in affirmation to the judgment recorded by the learned Special Judge, So
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.