SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(HP) 2260

SURESHWAR THAKUR
Dev Raj – Appellant
Versus
Sandhya Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Sureshwar Thakur, J.

The respondent herein had instituted a complaint against the complainant/petitioner herein before the State Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau, Solan qua the complainant/petitioner herein demanding illegal gratification for meteing transport expenses for visiting various places for verifying the position, status and tagging of cows purchased by the members of Self Help Group, Badhal, headed by the respondent herein. Consequently, FIR No. 11 of 2010 of 21.06.2010 stood registered against the complainant/petitioner herein constituting therein commission of offences by him under Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. In sequel to the registration of the FIR, the complainant/petitioner herein faced prosecution before the learned Special Judge, Solan. The Charge for which he came to be tried stood concluded by the learned Special Judge, Solan to remain unsubstantiated whereupon it pronounced an order acquitting the accused/complainant/ petitioner herein. In an appeal carried therefrom by the State of Himachal Pradesh before this Court, this Court pronounced a judgment in affirmation to the judgment recorded by the learned Special Judge, So

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top