SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(HP) 2255

SURESHWAR THAKUR
State of H. P. – Appellant
Versus
Khem Chand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Vivek Singh Attri, adv
For the Respondent:Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Sureshwar Thakur, Judge

The instant appeal stands directed against the impugned judgement recorded by the learned Sessions Judge, Shimla, whereby he reversed the findings of conviction recorded upon the accused by the learned trial Court and acquitted the accused respondent herein for his allegedly committing offences punishable under Sections 279 and 337 IPC.

2. The brief facts of the case are that on 9th July, 2002 at 3.40 p.m. on duty pharmacist, DDU Hospital, Shimla, informed Police Station, Sadar, Shimla that a lady has been brought to the hospital in an injured condition. On this information H.C Lal Singh and constable Rai Singh were sent to DDU Hospital for investigation vide daily diary Ext.PW-9/A. The complainant made a statement Ext.PW-2/A that her daughter in law was admitted in Ripon Hospital, Shimla for the last 10-12 days and she came to Shimla to see her. When she wanted to cross the road near Ripon Hospital, a red coloured car came and hit her from right side. The car was being driven rashly and negligently. She has stated that she suffered injuries on the right side of the body. The number of the car was noted by her nephew Ramesh Kumar. In the meantime, a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top