SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(HP) 897

AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Rupa Suri – Appellant
Versus
Neelam Rana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. R.L. Sood, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Arjun Lal, Mr. Vipin Pandit, Mr. P.S. Goverdhan,

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Mohan Goel, J.:

As similar factual matrix and common issues of law are involved in all these petitions, therefore, these petitions are being disposed of vide a common judgment.

2. Facts resulting in filing of each of the above petitions are mentioned hereinbelow in brief.

(a) CMPMO No. 550 of 2017 (Rupa Suri Vs. Neelam Rana)

3. Respondent/plaintiff Neelam Rana has filed Civil Suit 147/1 of 2015/12 for declaration to the effect that sale deed dated 17th June, 2000 with respect to land comprised in Khasra No. 137/12/2/4, measuring 015 biswas, out of Khasra No. 137/12/2, measuring 610 bighas alongwith the built up area, situated at Mauza Mashobra, Pargna Dharti, Tehsil Kasauli, District Solan being result of fraud, misrepresentation and based upon forged documents, be cancelled and declared as illegal, void and inoperative against the rights of the plaintiff and a decree for possession alongwith structure on the same be passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant. This suit is pending adjudication before the Court of learned Senior Civil Judge, Kasauli, District Solan, H.P. Petitioner herein, namely, Rupa Suri is the defendant in the said suit.

4. Present pet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top