SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(HP) 204

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
SABINA, SATYEN VAIDYA, JJ.
Subeena Sabri, W/o. Sadiq Mohammed - Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P., Through Additional Chief Secretary (Social Justice and Empowerment) H.P. & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 8043 of 2021
Decided On : 19-05-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sh. R.K. Gautam, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Rishab Chandel.
For the Respondent:Sh. Ashwani Sharma, Additional Advocate General.

Point of Law : Petitioner is married in the State of Himachal Pradesh to a person belonging to OBC and even the Caste to which the petitioner belonged in the State of her origin has been declared as a OBC in the State of Himachal Pradesh, cannot be held sufficient to carve out an exception to the mandate of law.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 341, 341(1), 342(1), 340, 342, 14 and 16 - Socially and educationally backward classes - Caste/Community - Scheduled Castes - Petitioner was born in State of Bihar - She belonged to Muslim (Ansari) Caste/Community, which has been declared as Other Backward Class in the State of Bihar - Petitioner married bonafide resident of State of Himachal Pradesh - Husband of petitioner belongs to Muslim (Teli) Caste/Community, which is also declared as OBC in state of Himachal Pradesh - Ansari Caste/Community is also included in the Central List of OBC in State of Himachal Pradesh - Petitioner has also been issued Bonafide Himachali Certificate, after her marriage - Respondent No.2 for issuance of a certificate of eligibility for reservation of jobs for OBC application has remained undecided - Petitioner is married in the State of Himachal Pradesh to a person belonging to OBC and even the Caste to which the petitioner belonged in the State of her origin has been declared as a OBC in the State of Himachal Pradesh, cannot be held sufficient to carve out an exception to the mandate of law (Para 20).

Finding of the Court : Court repeatedly has held that migration for from one State to another, cannot be a sufficient ground for claiming benefit of being SC/ST/OBC in the migratee state - Objective criteria for declaration of a particular Caste or Tribe as SC/ST/OBC in one State is specific level of backwardness, social disparage and economic disadvantages prevalent in such state - Caste notified as Scheduled Caste/ tribe/ OBC in one State may also find place in list of notified Scheduled Caste/ Tribe/OBC in other, but same has not been held to be sufficient for claiming benefit in other State by a person after migration for reason that degree of disadvantages of various elements which constitute data for specification may be entirely different - Petitioner is married in State of Himachal Pradesh to a person belonging to OBC and even Caste to which petitioner belonged in State of her origin has been declared as a OBC in State of Himachal Pradesh, cannot be held sufficient to carve out an exception to mandate of law

Result: Petition dismissed

ORDER :

By way of instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following substantive relief: -

    “That the respondents be directed to allow her application for issuance of a certificate for eligibility for reservation of jobs for Other Backward Classes and services under Government of India as she belongs to a Caste/Community, which is recognized by the State of Himachal Pradesh and she is married to Sadiq Mohammed, who also belongs to a Caste/Community, which is recognized as Other Backward Classes in the State of Himachal Pradesh.”

2. Petitioner was born in State of Bihar. She belonged to Muslim (Ansari) Caste/Community, which has been declared as Other Backward Class (for short, “OBC”) in the State of Bihar. Petitioner married one Sadiq Mohammed, a bonafide resident of State of Himachal Pradesh. The husband of petitioner belongs to Muslim (Teli) Caste/Community, which is also declared as OBC in state of Himachal Pradesh. The Ansari Caste/Community is also included in the Central List of OBC in State of Himachal Pradesh. Petitioner has also been issued Bonafide Himachali Certificate, after her marriage with Sadiq Mohammed.

3. Petitioner has applied to respondent No.2 for issuance of a certificate of eligibility for reservation of jobs for OBC. However, her application has remained undecided, forcing the petitioner to approach this Court by way of the present petition.

4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the record carefully.

5. The question that arises for determination is whether the petitioner by virtue of being married to a person belonging to OBC in Himachal Pradesh or by inclusion of the original caste of petitioner (Ansari) in the list of Other Backward Classes in the State of Himachal Pradesh is entitled for issuance of a certificate of eligibility for reservation of jobs for Other Backward Classes in the State of Himachal Pradesh?

6. Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution of India read as under: -

    “341. Scheduled Castes. — (1) The President [may with respect to any State [or Union territory], and where it is a State, after consultation with the Governor thereof,] by public notification, specify the castes, races or tribes or parts of or groups within castes, races or tribes which shall for the purposes of this Constitution be deemed to be Scheduled Castes in relation to that State [or Union territory, as the case may be.]

(2) Parliament may by law include in or exclude from the list of Scheduled Castes specified in a notification issued under clause (1) any caste, race or tribe or part of or group within any caste, race or tribe, but save as aforesaid a notification issued under the said clause shall not be varied by any subsequent notification.

342. Scheduled Tribes. — (1) The President [may with respect to any State or Union territory, and where it is a State, after consultation with the Governor thereof,] by public notification, specify the tribes or tribal communities or parts of or groups within tribes or tribal communities which shall for the purposes of this Constitution be deemed to be Scheduled Tribes in relation to that State or Union territory, as the case may be.

(2) Parliament may by law include in or exclude from the list of Scheduled Tribes specified in a notification issued under clause (1) any tribe or tribal community or part of or group within any tribe or tribal community, but save as aforesaid a notification issued under the said clause shall not be varied by any subsequent notification.

342A. Socially and educationally backward classes. — (1) The President may with respect to any State or Union territory, and where it is a State, after consultation with the Governor thereof, by public notification, specify the socially and educationally backward classes which shall for the purposes of this Constitution be deemed to be socially and educationally backward classes in relation to that State or Union territory, as the case may be.

(2) Parliament may by law include in or

                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                1
                2
                3
                4
                5
                6
                7
                8
                9
                10
                11
                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                supreme today icon
                logo-black

                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                Please visit our Training & Support
                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                qr

                Scan Me!

                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                whatsapp-icon Back to top