SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(HP) 219

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
JYOTSNA REWAL DUA, J.
H.P. STATE ELECTION DEPARTMENT – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH – Respondent
CIVIL WRIT PETITION (ORIGINAL APPLICATION) No. 640 of 2020
Decided On : 02-06-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: RANJANA PARMAR, KARAN SINGH PARMAR.
For the Respondents: ARVIND SHARMA, NARENDER SINGH THAKUR, ANKUSH DASS SOOD, ARJUN LALL.

Point of Law: Election Commission has to act in conformity with the laws made by the Legislature and it cannot transgress the same.

Headnote:

State Election Department - Claim of honorarium for performing duties during State Legislative Assembly elections - Duties in Vidhan Sabha Elections - Officers performing election duties in terms of provisions of The Representation of the People Act are to be deemed to be on deputation to the Election Commission for the period during which they are so employed. Such staff during that period is subject to the control, superintendence and discipline of the Election Commission of India. (Para 5)

Finding of the Court:

Superintendence, direction, control and conduct of all elections to the Parliament and to the Legislature of every State vest in the Election Commission of India.

(iii) Article 324 of the Constitution of India is a reservoir of power to the Election Commission of India to act for the purpose of ensuring fair and free elections. The words ‘superintendence, direction, control and conduct of all elections’ used in Article 324 of the Constitution are of wide amplitude, which include the power to make all necessary provisions for conducting free and fair elections including issuing instructions to cope up with some situations, which may not be provided for in the enacted laws and rules.

Result: writ petition is allowed

ORDER :

1. The employees working in different capacities in the State Election Department are members of the petitioner, a registered Association. The short and simple point being put forth by the petitioner is that the respondents are required to pay honorarium to such of the employees of State Election Department, who perform duties in Vidhan Sabha Elections.

2. Pleadings:

    (i) Pleadings of petitioner:

The petitioner has pleaded that its members have been working in the Election Department and performing election duties assigned to them, be it for the Parliamentary or the State Legislative Assembly Elections. Honorarium for discharging election duties was paid by the respondent-State till 1998. In the year 1998, simultaneous elections were held for Parliament and Vidhan Sabha/State Legislative Assembly. Members of the petitioner- Association on election duty were paid honorarium for Parliamentary as well as State Legislative Assembly elections, but subsequently, the State stopped paying honorarium for duties performed by the members of the petitioner- Association (employees of the State Election Department) in State Legislative Assembly elections. Petitioner-Association pointed out its grievances regarding requirement to pay honorarium to its members for performing duties in State Legislative Assembly elections. These grievances though were considered by the respondents in various meetings, however, they have not been redressed till date.

(ii) Pleadings of respondents No. 1 to 3:

The State of Himachal Pradesh through the Secretary (Elections), Secretary (Finance) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh and Chief Electoral Officer, Himachal Pradesh have filed a common reply. Their reply states that honorarium for Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabha elections was being paid to the election staff since 1977. The Election Commission of India in its letter dated 23.06.1998, had directed all the States to pay honorarium to all Officers and Staff of Election Department at the rate of one month’s pay for the conduct of all elections to Parliament and State Legislative Assemblies or simultaneous elections. With effect from the year 1998, in the State of Himachal Pradesh honorarium is being paid to the Election staff only for Lok Sabha general elections. Honorarium in connection with general elections to Vidhan Sabha was discontinued by the State Government w.e.f. 1998 owing to 100% liability on the State. 100% expenditure on account of Lok Sabha election is borne by the Government of India and in case of Vidhan Sabha election, 100% expenditure is borne by the respective State Government. In case of simultaneous elections to Lok Sabaha & Vidhan Sabha, the expenditure is borne on the basis of 50:50 by Government of India & State Government. It has further been stated in the reply that the matter for paying honorarium to the officers and staff of the Election Department in connection with conduct of Vidhan Sabha elections was taken up many times with the State Finance Department, but the Finance Department regretted its inability to approve the proposals. Finance Department’s view as expressed in office communication dated 30.06.2017 is that the Election Staff has little extra work during elections, but for the rest of the time, they have very little work, therefore, there is no justification to pay them honorarium.

(iii) Pleadings of respondent No. 4:

Respondent No. 4, i.e. Election Commission of India, has filed its separate reply to the writ petition. The stand therein is that anomalies, inconsistencies and discrepancies existed in matter of payment of honorarium to the officers appointed for the conduct of elections. In order to bring uniformity and for removing doubts pertaining to payment of honorarium in respect of elections held to Parliament and State Legislative Assemblies, the Election Commission of India issued letter dated 23.06.1998, directing the State Governments to pay honorarium to all Officers and employees directly connected with electi

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      Judicial Analysis

      SupremeToday

      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top