RAVI MALIMATH
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Abha – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ravi Malimath, J
Being aggrieved by the order passed by the trial Court in rejecting the defendant’s application under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC, the defendant is in appeal. The application seeking amendment of the written statement was filed when the matter was listed for defendant’s witnesses. The application was filed after the issues were framed and the matter was listed for defendant’s witnesses. On considering the plea, the trial Court rejected the application.
2. On considering the reasons assigned, I do not find any ground to interfere with the same. Once the trial has commenced, no amendment can be allowed provided due diligence has been shown. To this extent, I asked the learned counsel as to what is the due diligence. The due diligence, as stated by him, is only in para-9 of the application under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 of CPC for amendment of written statement, wherein it is stated as follows:-
3. Except this, there is no other avermen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.