SURESHWAR THAKUR
Anil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.
1. Since, both the afore writ petitions encapsulate similar subject matters and, also since common question of facts, and, law are involved in all the afore writ petitions, thereupon, they are amenable for a common verdict being made thereon.
2. In pursuance to advertisement notice, borne in Annexure P-1, the writ petitioners applied for the advertised post of Male Multipurpose Health Workers. The appointments to the afore advertised post, was published to be made on a contractual basis. The petitioners applied for the afore post. In contemporaneity to the issuance of the afore advertisement notice, the R&P Rules appended as Annexure R-1, were both in vogue, and, obviously held their clout. Furthermore, the minimum educational, and, other qualifications required to be possessed by the aspirants concerned, stand detailed therein, in the manner extracted hereinafter:
| 7. Minimum Educational and other qualification required for direct recruits | (a) Essential Qualification |
| (i) Should be a 10+2 or its equivalent from a recognized Board of | |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.