SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(HP) 1279

KURIAN JOSEPH, SURJIT SINGH
Pushp Lata – Appellant
Versus
State Of H. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sr. Addl. Advocate General

ORDER :

Kurian Joseph, C.J., Oral

Petitioner's grievance is against the promotion of her junior, Bimla Chauhan to the post of Assistant Malaraia Officer. Admittedly, the post was reserved for a scheduled caste candidate. Bimla Chauhan was junior to the petitioner and was being reflected as a scheduled caste employee in the seniority list, since long. Petitioner claims that she too belongs to a scheduled caste and, therefore, the post should have been offered to her, she being senior to Bimla Chauhan.

2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record.

3. We find on record photostat copy of the first sheet of service book of the petitioner, which though does not very specifically indicate that the petitioner belongs to a scheduled caste, yet the words 'Indian (Harijan) (sub caste Koli)' are written against the column 'race' and the term 'Harijan' is used for scheduled caste, in this part of the country.

4. Respondents do not deny in their reply that the petitioner belongs to a scheduled caste category, but they say that in the seniority lists, which were being circulated since 1989, she is reflected as general category employee and she never made any represe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top