JUDGMENT :

Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (Oral)

Mr. Anup Rattan, learned Additional Advocate General, stated at the Bar that the name of respondent No. 8 has wrongly been reflected in the array of respondents as it should be 'Municipal Council, Dharamshala through its Executive Officer, Dharamshala, District Kangra'. His statement is taken on record. Accordingly, name of respondent No. 8 be read as 'Municipal Council, Dharamshala through its Executive Officer, Dharamshala, District Dharamshala'. Registry is directed to carry out necessary correction in the cause title.

2. Respondents No. 1 to 4 and 6 have filed the fresh compliance/status reports. We have gone through the same and are of the view that the same are not in tune with the directions made by this Court. Thus, we record our dissatisfaction.

3. The Registry has also received complaints along with CD, perusal of which do disclose that the authorities are not taking actions against the persons who are violating the directions issued by this Court, as warranted under law and who are also involved in the commission of offences punishable under penal laws and other laws applicable. It is also mentioned in one of the complaints