KULDIP SINGH
Someer Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Col. Prem Vir Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Kuldip Singh, J.
This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing order dated 27.05.2011 and proceedings in Criminal Complaint No. 252-2 of 2010 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shimla, under Sections 406, 420, 120-B IPC. The facts, in brief, are that respondent No.1 has filed complaint under Sections 406, 420, 120-B IPC against petitioners and respondent No.2 which is pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shimla. On 27.05.2011, the petitioners and respondent No.2 have been summoned under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B IPC.
2. The case set-up by the complainant is that petitioner No.1 contacted him in July, 2008 and represented that he can get the Flat No.A-1, Block-10, Housing Board Colony, Shimla, owned by respondent No.2 sold to complainant as petitioner No.2 was authorised attorney of respondent No.2 owner and entitled to sell the flat. On the assurance of petitioner No.1, the complainant was induced to pay Rs. 1,00,000/- to petitioner No.1. The complainant was assured that deal would be concluded by 30.08.2008. The payment of Rs. 1,00,000/- was made by self-bearer cheque No.313861 dated 24.07.2008 drawn on
Priya Vrat Singh v. Shyam Ji Sahai
Trisuns Chemical Industry Vs. Rajesh Agarwal
Indian Oil Corpn. Vs. NEPC India Ltd.
Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia v. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre
Rupan Deol Bajaj v. Kanwar Pal Singh Gill
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Duncans Agro Industries Ltd.
State of Bihar v. Rajendra Agrawalla
Rajesh Bajaj v. State NCT of Delhi
Medchl Chemicals & Pharma (P) Ltd. v. Biological E. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.