SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(HP) 897

KULDIP SINGH
Shri Ankush Thakur, Shri Vir Singh Thakur And Smt. Leela Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Kuldip Singh, J.

1. This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing order dated 31.10.2011 passed by respondent No. 2 Sub Divisional Magistrate, Solan in case No. 394/2004 of 2011 and for quashing of entire proceedings of case No. 394/2004 of 2011 pending before respondent No. 2.

2. The facts, in brief, are that petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 3 are husband and wife. The petitioner No. 2 is the father and petitioner No. 3 is the mother of petitioner No. 1. The petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 3 got married on 8.10.2009. The further facts as narrated in the petition are that Master Karanvir Singh Thakur was born from the wedlock of petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 3 on 9.6.2010 at Kamla Nehru Hospital, Shimla. The child from birth is looked after by the petitioner No. 3.

3. The respondent No. 3 after availing maternity leave left Shimla for Parwanoo alongwith petitioner No. 1 and the child in order to join her duties. The petitioner No. 3 stayed at Parwanoo to look after child as the respondent No. 3 was unable to look after the child being employed.

4. The petitioner No. 2 a heart patient had to live alone

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top