SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(HP) 976

NARINDER CHAUHAN
Kishan Chand – Appellant
Versus
Harjesh Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Rahul Gupta, Advocate
For the Respondent:K.K. Chaudhary, Advocate

ORDER :

Narinder Chauhan, Financial Commissioner

The revision petition under Section 114 of the H.P. Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972, is directed against the order dated 2.4.2010, passed by the Commissioner, Kangra Division, in Appeal No. 330/2003, whereby he has accepted the appeal and set aside the order dated 27.10.2003, passed by the Collector (ADM), Kangra, as well as the order of the Land Reforms Officer, Dharamshala, dated 7.8.2001.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that Shri Kishan Chand, present petitioner had filed two LR-V Forms for resumption of land before L.R.O., Kangra; one pertaining to Mohal Upahu, vide Misal No. 1733, against Shri Charnaru Ram, tenant, and another; pertaining to Mohal Jhikli Dari, vide Misal No. 102-D, against Shri Punnu and other tenants. The LRO took up the LR-V form in Misal No. 1733 for resumption of land in Mohal Upahu and decided the same vide order dated 6.8.1984, by allowing resumption of land to the extent of the prescribed limit from Shri Chamru Ram, tenant. However, no proceedings were undertaken by the L.R.O on the second LR-V form, pertaining to mohal Jhikli Dari till 13.3.1990, and in the mean while a new tehsil was create

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top