SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(HP) 2520

KULDIP SINGH
Tara Chand – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Kuldip Singh, J

1. Tara Chand, Budh Ram and Lok Bahadur were prosecuted for offences punishable under Sections 447, 379 Indian Penal Code and Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act, Budh Ram died during trial. The learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rampur Bushahr in case No. 12-2 of 2000 acquitted Tara Chand and Lok Bahadur for offence punishable u/s 447 Indian Penal Code and Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act but convicted them u/s 379 Indian Penal Code on 25.3.2004. Tara Chand has been sentenced to undergo simple 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment ? yes imprisonment for six months and fine of Rs. 1,000/-. Lok Bahadur was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three months and fine of Rs. 500/-. In default of payment of fine, both of them were sentenced to undergo further imprisonment. Tara Chand and Lok Bahadur filed Criminal Appeal No. 3 of 2004 which so far Lok Bahadur is concerned has been allowed but appeal of Tara Chand was dismissed on 22.1.2005 by the learned Sessions Judge, Kinnaur Sessions Division at Rampur Bushahr, hence revision by Tara Chand.

2. The facts in brief are that Budh Ram since deceased at the relevan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top