NARINDER CHAUHAN
RAJINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This revision petition has been preferred under section 24(4) of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), against the order dated 17-12-2011 passed by Chief Settlement Commissioner, Rehabilitation. H.P., in Case no. 35/2001 CSC, whereby the order dated 22.7.1996, passed by the Naib-Tehsildar (Sales)-cum-Managing Officer, Kangra, was set aside and conveyance deed executed on 23-07-1996, in favour of the petitioner, was cancelled.
2. Brief facts of the case are that land comprised in Khasra nos. 228, 246, 247, 248, 257, 258, 260, 333, 334, 338, 339, 350, 352, 353, 354, 358, 249, 351, 1353, 1363, 1385, 1386, 1391, 1392, 1393, 2100, 2115, 2116, 2117, 2118, 2184, 2125, 2254, 2260, 2272,2273,2274,2275, 2276,2361/1, 2430,2432, 2449, 2440,2441, 2442, kita 46, area 23-95-62 hectares, situated in Mauza Bhadpur, Tehsil Fatehpur, District Kangra, H.P., was recorded in the ownership and possession of the Central Government. The Naib-Tehsildar (Sales)-cum-Managing Officer, Kangra transferred this land in favour of the proforma respondents no. 3 to 5, nemaly; Shri Nageshwar, half share, and Servjit Singh, Mohinder Singh both
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.