SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(HP) 2627

AJAY MOHAN GOEL
GOPAL KRISHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Lakshay Thakur.
For the Respondent: Mr. Vikram Thakur.

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Mohan Goel, J.

1. By way this revision petition, accused/petitioner has challenged the judgment passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mandi, in Criminal Appeal No. 27 of 2008, dated 12.01.2011, vide which learned Appellate Court, while dismissing the appeal so filed by the present petitioner, upheld the judgment of conviction and sentence imposed upon the present petitioner by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Court No. 2, Sunder Nagar, District Mandi, in Police Challan No. 388-I/06/374-II/06, dated 16.05.2008, whereby learned trial Court had convicted the present petitioner for commission of offences punishable under Sections 279, 337 and 338 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC' ) and Section 187 of the Motor Vehicle Act (hereinafter referred to as 'M.V. Act') and sentenced him as under:

S. No.

Section

Sentence awarded

1.

279 of IPC

Simple imprisonment for four months and fine of Rs. 1000/-.

2.

337 of IPC

Simple imprisonment for four months and fine of Rs. 500/-.

3.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top