SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 952

JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
JOGINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
PADAM CHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sh. Rahul Mahajan.
For the Respondent: Sh. Suneet Goel.

ORDER :

1. An application moved by the defendants for amendment of the written statement at the stage of evidence was partly allowed by the learned trial Court vide order dated 4.11.2014. The plaintiff has challenged this order in the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

2. The status of the parties hereinafter is being referred to as it was before the learned trial Court:

    (i) Suit was filed by the plaintiff for vacant possession of the land comprised in Khata Katauni No.101/295(Old) 130/326 (New) and old khasra No.293min, 292, 298, 300 min and new khasra No.719, 723, 725, 734 and 735 total kitas 05, area measuring 00-25-01 hectares situated at Chak Chirgaon, Tehsil Chirgaon, Distt. Shimla H.P. It was submitted that the plaintiff was owner of the suit land. Defendants had illegally encroached upon the suit land, unauthorizedly planted apple plants over the same and changed the nature of the suit land.

(ii) The defence was that the defendants were non-occupancy tenants over the suit land and thus had become owners in possession of the suit land. It was pleaded that the possession of the defendants and their ancestors over the suit land to the knowledge

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top