SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(HP) 268

JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
Prem Chand (Deceased) Through Legal Representatives – Appellant
Versus
Manohar Lal Son Of Bhuttu Ram – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sh. Tanju Thakur, Advocate

ORDER :

This appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure arises out of concurrent judgments & decrees passed by learned Courts below, partly decreeing the suit filed by the appellant for injunction.

2. A suit for permanent prohibitory injunction was instituted by the appellants against the respondents. Appellants pleaded that they were owners in possession of the land comprised in Khata No.147, Khatauni No.220, Khasra Nos.528, 530, 531, 532, 533 and 537, measuring 0- 09-61 hectares situated at Mohal Lahar, Mauza Lambagaon, Tehsil Jaisinghpur, District Kangra.

2(a). Plaintiffs averred therein that the defendants without any right, title and interest had encroached two marlas of the suit land by raising structure thereupon. That they were interfering over the suit land with an intention to encroach and take forcible possession of remaining part of the land.

2(b). Respondents/defendants on merits took up the defence that the suit land was mortgaged by the plaintiffs/their predecessors with one Shri Bhuttu son of Sardha son of Dholak (predecessor-in-interest of defendant No.1) to the extent of ½ share, with Shri Nathu Ram son of Mangatu to the extent of ¼ share and with Shri Dinu a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top