Vinay Thakur S/o Shri Sunder Singh Thakur VS State Of Himachal

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SANDEEP SHARMA
Vinay Thakur S/o Shri Sunder Singh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :MR. ONKAR JAIRATH, ADVOCATE
For the Respondent:MR. SUDHIR BHATNAGAR AND MR. NARINDER GULERIA, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATES GENERAL WITH MR. SUNNY DHATWALIA, MR. VIKRANT THAKUR, ADVOCATE

ORDER :

By way of instant petition filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:

“i) That the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue the Writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction quashing and setting aside the Impugned Clause-7 as contained in Himachal Pradesh Technical Education, Vocational and Industrial Training Department, Principal (B.Pharmacy) (Class-I Gazetted) Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2008 (Annexure P-6) being illegal, discriminatory and ultra vires to the provisions of the Constitution of India, besides being in conflict with the Pharmacy Council of India, besides being in conflict with the Pharmacy Council of India and All India Council of Technical Education norms.

ii) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue the writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction directing the Respondents to substitute essential experience as contained in Clause 7 of the Himachal Pradesh Technical Education, Vocational and Industrial Training Depar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

SANDEEP SHARMAVinay Thakur S/o Shri Sunder Singh Thakur – AppellantVersusState Of Himachal – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

SANDEEP SHARMA
Vinay Thakur S/o Shri Sunder Singh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal – Respondent