SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
SANDEEP SHARMA, J.
Sh. Vinay Thakur S/o Shri Sunder Singh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal – Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No.5720 of 2020
Decided on : 03-08-2022

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :MR. ONKAR JAIRATH, ADVOCATE
For the Respondent:MR. SUDHIR BHATNAGAR AND MR. NARINDER GULERIA, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATES GENERAL WITH MR. SUNNY DHATWALIA, MR. VIKRANT THAKUR, ADVOCATE

Point of Law: It is clear that for maintaining standards of education in schools, NCTE is now specifically empowered to determine qualifications of persons for being recruited as teachers in schools or colleges.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 150 – Article 226 - Recruitment and Promotion Rules for post of Principal (B.Pharmacy) (Class I) (Gazetted) in Pharmacy College in the Department of Technical Education, Vocational and Industrial Training, Himachal Pradesh – Rule 7 and 10 - Himachal Pradesh Technical Education, Vocational and Industrial Training Department, Principal (B.Pharmacy) (Class-I Gazetted) Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2008 - Minimum Educational and other qualifications required for direct recruits - Post of Principal - Recruitment - Whether respondent-State, while framing Recruitment and Promotion Rules for appointment to post of Director/Principal of Government College of Pharmacy could prescribe educational qualifications/experience lesser than that provided by statutory authorities like Pharmacy Council of India and AICTE or not - Whether respondents can be permitted to go ahead with appointments to post in question on basis of un-amended Recruitment and Promotion Rules or not - It is clear that regulations issued by statutory bodies like Pharmacy Council of India, AICTE or NCTE are binding upon State and all subsequent actions of State should be in conformity with such guidelines/regulations etc. (Para 23)

Finding of the court: It is not in dispute that Regulations framed in year 2008 by Pharmacy Council of India and AICTE were subsequently amended by way of Notification whereby essential qualifications/and period of experience for recruitment to post of Director/Principal in Government Pharmacy Colleges came to be modified - Once it is not in dispute that the Recruitment and Promotion Rules for post of Director/Principal notified by respondents in 2008, were made in consonance with Regulations framed by Pharmacy Council of India and AICTE, any amendment with regard to educational qualification and other standards by statutory bodies like Pharmacy Council of India and AICTE, ought to have been incorporated in Recruitment and Promotion Rules by way of AN amendment - Rules 7 quashed and set aside. Respondents are directed to take steps for amendment to bring same in conformity with essential qualification/experience prescribed by Pharmacy Council of India and/or AICTE for appointment to post of Director/Principal vide Notification.

Result: Petition allowed.

ORDER :

By way of instant petition filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:

    “i) That the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue the Writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction quashing and setting aside the Impugned Clause-7 as contained in Himachal Pradesh Technical Education, Vocational and Industrial Training Department, Principal (B.Pharmacy) (Class-I Gazetted) Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2008 (Annexure P-6) being illegal, discriminatory and ultra vires to the provisions of the Constitution of India, besides being in conflict with the Pharmacy Council of India, besides being in conflict with the Pharmacy Council of India and All India Council of Technical Education norms.

ii) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue the writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction directing the Respondents to substitute essential experience as contained in Clause 7 of the Himachal Pradesh Technical Education, Vocational and Industrial Training Department, Principal (B.Pharmacy) (Class-I Gazetted) Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2008 (Annexure P-6) with the experience as prescribed in Minimum Qualification for Teachers in Pharmacy Institutions Regulations, 2014 (Annexure P-7) i.e. 15 Years Experience in teaching out of which 5 years must be as Professor/HOD in a PCI approved/recognized Pharmacy College or with the experience as prescribed in Gazette of India Notification dated 01.03.2019 (Annexure P-8) i.e. minimum 15 years of experience in teaching/research/industry, out of which atleast 3 years shall be at the post equivalent to that of professor.

2. Petitioners herein, who are working as Professor and Associate Professor in Government Pharmacy College Nagrota Bagwan, District Kangra and Rohru, District Shimla respectively are aggrieved of the minimum educational qualification prescribed under Rule-7 of the Recruitment and Promotion Rules for the post of Principal (B.Pharmacy) (Class I) (Gazetted) in Pharmacy College in the Department of Technical Education, Vocational and Industrial Training, Himachal Pradesh (hereinafter, ‘Rules’). Rule-7, whereof provides as under:

    “7. Minimum Educational and other qualifications required for direct recruits.

ESSENTIAL QUALIFICATION: (i) QUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE FOR CANDIDATES FROM REACHING, Ph.D degree (with first Class Master’s Degree in the appropriate branch of specialization in Pharmacy and with 10 years experience of which at least 05 years experience at senior level comparable to that of an Professor would also be eligible.

(ii) DESIRABLE QUALIFICATION:

(i) Administrative experience in a responsible position.

(ii) Knowledge of customs, manners and dialects of Himachal Pradesh and suitability for appointment in the peculiar conditions prevailing in the Pradesh.”

3. As per Rule 10 of the Rules, post of Principal, in the College of Pharmacy is to be filled up 100% by way of promotion failing which by direct recruitment or on contract basis. Clause 10 of the Rules provides as under:

    “10. Method of recruitment, whether by direct recruitment or by promotion, deputation, transfer and the percentage of vacancies to be filled in by various methods: 100% promotion failing which by direct recruitment or on contract basis.”

4. Precisely the grouse of the petitioners is that the minimum educational qualification under Rule 7 of the Rules, is not in consonance with the Regulations issued by the Pharmacy Council of India vide Notification dated 11.11.2014 (Annexure P-7), whereby minimum educational qualification for appointment to the post of Director, Principal/head of institution has been prescribed as follows:

Director/Principal/Head of Institution

First Class B.Pharm with Master’s degree in Pharmacy (M. Pharm) in appropriate branch of sp

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top