SATYEN VAIDYA
NITIN KUMAR S/O SHRI JAGDISH RAJ RATTAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH – Respondent
ORDER :
1. By way of instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following substantive reliefs:
(c) That the respondents be directed to release all consequential benefits to the petitioner in view of his regularization with effect from November, 2006 i.e. increments, regular pay scale and all other benefits which are available to regular employees etc.”
2. Brief facts necessary for adjudication of the instant petition are that petitioner was appointed on the post of Peon in the office of Child Development Project Officer, Una, District Una, H.P. vide order dated 6.11.2006, on contract basis. Petitioner is a specially abled person, having 90% permanent disability on account of hearing impairment. The appointment of petitioner was made against the post, reserved for persons with disability. The precise grievance of the petitioner is that his appointment on contract basis was improper. As per petitioner, at the time of his appointment, there was no provision in the then existing Recruitment & Promotion R
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.