IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA, R.L. KHURANA, JJ.
Swami Ram Dass Bandhu - Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 169 of 2004
Decided On : 10-09-2004
Rape - Indian Penal Code - Section 376 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the legal provisions of Section 164(6), Section 173(5), and Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, emphasizing the accused's right to receive copies of witness statements for effective defense. The court highlighted the importance of providing the accused with all witness statements, including contradictory ones, to enable effective cross-examination and testing of witness reliability. The judgment also emphasized the need to avoid prejudice to the accused and the consequences of failure to supply witness statements. The court found that the failure to supply the copy of the prosecutrix's statement recorded under Section 164, Code of Criminal Procedure, caused prejudice to the accused and affected the fairness of the trial.
Fact of the Case:
The prosecutrix attended a religious congregation where she was allegedly raped by the accused. The prosecutrix and her mother reported the incident to the police the following day. The accused denied the allegations and claimed to have been falsely implicated.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the offence beyond a reasonable doubt. It highlighted inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, including the lack of evidence supporting the timing and location of the alleged rape, and the absence of witnesses to corroborate the prosecutrix's account. The court also noted discrepancies in the handling of case evidence, including the tampering of sealed packets, which raised doubts about the reliability of the forensic report.
Issues: The key issues included the failure to supply the accused with a copy of the prosecutrix's statement recorded under Section 164, Code of Criminal Procedure, and the lack of corroborative evidence supporting the prosecution's case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the accused's right to receive all witness statements for effective defense and highlighted the consequences of failure to supply witness statements. It also emphasized the need to avoid prejudice to the accused and the importance of providing contradictory witness statements for effective cross-examination and testing of witness reliability.
Final Decision: The court acquitted the accused of the offence under Section 376 Indian Penal Code, set aside the conviction and sentence, and ordered the accused's release from jail if not required in any other case. The fine, if already realized, was to be refunded to the accused, and case property was to be dealt with as per the orders/directions of the trial court.
JUDGMENT :
R.L. Khurana, J.
The appellant, Ram Dass Bandhu, hereinafter referred to as the accused stands convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Solan in Sessions Trial No. 15-S/7 of 2002 vide judgment dated 8.12.2003 for the offence under Section 376 Indian Penal Code, and upon such conviction he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/-. In default of payment of fine, he has further been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. The amount of fine, if realized, was directed to be paid to the prosecutrix (P.W.5) as compensation.
2. By virtue of the present appeal preferred by the accused through Jail, he has assailed the conviction and sentence imposed upon him by the learned Additional Sessions Judge.
3. Briefly stated, the prosecution story is this. The accused claims himself to be a "Parcharak" (Religious Preacher) and is known as "Sant Shiromani Swami Ram Dass Bandhu". In April/May, 2001, he had organised a camp near Old Anaj Mandi, Ambala City in Haryana State for the purpose of delivering religious discourses and also to provide medicines for the cure of various ailments. The religious discourses were delivered in three sessions every day.
4. On 1.5.2001, the prosecutrix "G" (PW5) along with her mother "S" (PW6) went to attend the congregation which was held between 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. They reached the congregation at about 4.30 p.m. After having listened to the religious discourse for sometime P.W.5 and her mother P.W-6 approached the accused for getting some medicine for the treatment of the ailment with which P.W.5 was suffering. After examining P.W-5, the accused told her mother P.W-6 that he would like to administer the medicine to P.W.5 at some isolated place. The accused then took P.W.5 and her mother to a nearby "Chobara" above the shop of Messrs. Suraj Bhan Sadhu Ram, in which "hobara" the accused had set up his residence. After making P.W.6 to sit in a room, the accused took the prosecutrix P.W.5 to the kitchen located near the stairs. He then locked the kitchen from inside and made the prosecutrix to lie on a wooden table (Takhat). He then gagged her mouth and removed her panty and subjected her to forcible sexual intercourse. P.W-6 after having waited for 10/15 minutes, knocked at the kitchen door. The accused opened the door. P.W-5 came out of the kitchen. She was weeping and on being asked as to what happened, she narrated the entire occurrence to her mother P.W-6. Both P.W-5 and P.W-6 returned home and narrated the occurrence to Shri Raj Kumar, the father of the prosecutrix P.W.5. The occurrence was not disclosed to anyone either by P.W.5 or P.W.6 or the father of the prosecutrix out of shame and fear on that day. However, on the following day, that is, 2.5.2001 at about 10.05 a.m. P.W-5 accompanied her mother went to Police Post No. 1, Ambala and made a report Ex. P.W-5/A to P.W-12 Assistant Sub Inspector Mange Ram, on the basis of which a case for the offence under Section 376 Indian Penal Code, came to be registered at Police Station, Ambala City vide FIR No. 165, Ex. PA.
5. P.W-6, the mother of the prosecutrix, produced the panty (underwear) Ex. P1 belonging to the prosecutrix before P.W-12 ASI Mange Ram, which was taken in possession vide memo Ex. P.W-1/A.
6. P.W-6, the prosecutrix was sent for medical examination. Such medical examination was carried out by PW-10 Dr. Veenu Sethi at civil Hospital, Ambala, at about 11.45 a.m. on 2.5.2001. P.W-10 observed as under :
"Alleged history of being sexually assailed on the previous evening by some Sadhu
General Examination :
General condition was stable, conscious, well oriented, vitals maintained.
On examination no external mark of injury was seen on the body. The girl had started having her periods (menstrual) six months back. Her last menstrual period was 20.4.2001.
Breast was normally developed. Local Examination.
External genitalia, pubic hair developed. No external mark o
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.