SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 969

ANOOP CHITKARA
Inderjeet S/o. Shri Hira Lal – Appellant
Versus
Anuradha W/o. Shri Inderjeet – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sh. Goldy Kumar.
For the Respondent:Sh. Sanjeev Bushan, Senior Advocate with Sh. Rajesh Kumar and Sh. Rakesh Chauhan.

ORDER :

Criminal Petition No.

146-III-1/17 Decided on 28.11.2017 by JMFC, Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P.

Cr. Appeal No.

1-B/X/18 decided by Additional Sessions Judge, Kangra at Dharamshala, on 31.10.2018.

Aggrieved by the dismissal of appeal by the First Appellant Court, upholding the grant of interim maintenance to the aggrieved lady, the male respondent has come up before this Court.

2. Vide order captioned above, learned JMFC, Baijnath, had granted interim maintenance under Section 23 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, to the tune of Rs.2500/- per month against the demand of the lady of Rs.5000/- per month.

3. Aggrieved by the said order, male respondent challenged the same before learned Sessions Court Dharamshala. Vide the judgment, captioned above, learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kangra at Dharamshala, did not find any illegality in the order and dismissed the appeal.

4. Now, the male respondent has come up before this Court by way of present criminal revision, on the ground that the lady had cheated him by pretending to be unmarried, whereas, she was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top