SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 971

VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Vinay Kumar Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Divya Raj Singh.
For the Respondent: R.P. Singh.

JUDGMENT :

VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, J.

1. This petition has been preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 79 of 2020, dated 23.5.2020, registered under Sections 498-A, 323 and 34 Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter in short ‘IPC’) at Police Station Bhawarna, District Kangra H.P. and quashing of proceedings initiated in pursuant thereto vide Case No. 112 of 2020 pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Court No. 2, Palampur, District Kangra.

2. Petitioner No. 4 Deepshikha is complainant, who is wife of petitioner No. 1 Vinay Kumar and daughter-in-law of petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 namely Bihari Lal and Sunita Devi. Petitioner No. 1 Vinay Kumar and petitioner No. 4 Deepshikha were present on 14.12.2020 on which date their statements on oath have been recorded.

3. Petitioners herein are members of one family. Quashing of FIR in present petition has been prayed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties, photocopy whereof has been placed on record as Annexure P-3, which is duly signed by petitioner No. 4 Deepshikha and petitioners No. 1 to 3 namely Vinay Kumar, Bihari Lal and Sunita Devi. Both of them i.e. petitioner No. 1 as well as complainant have endors

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top