SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(HP) 2036

CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
N. C. Sareen – Appellant
Versus
Madan Vasudeva – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Neeraj Gupta, Rinki Kashmiri.
For the Respondent: Manohar Lal Sharma.

JUDGMENT :

CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA, J.

1. The present criminal appeal has been maintained by the appellant-complainant (hereinafter to be called as “the complainant”) against the judgment dated 01.09.2009, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class (1), Palampur, District Kangra, H.P. in Criminal Case No. 6-III/2008, whereby the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter to be called as “the Act”) has been dismissed.

2. Succinctly the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the complainant filed a complaint against the respondent-accused (hereinafter to be called as “the accused”) under Section 138 of the Act, wherein it has been alleged the complainant has been running a shop under the name and style of General Sales Agency, Cinema Road, Palampur and the accused had purchased certain articles from the complainant. In order to make the payment and liquidate his legal liability, the accused issued cheque No. 401430, dated 01.10.2007 for Rs. 20,000/- drawn at State Bank of India, Palampur in favour of the complainant. After receipt of the cheque, the complainant presented the same in his bank, i.e. State Bank of India, however, the cheque

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top