JUDGMENT :

Rajiv Sharma, J.-

1. The brief facts necessary for the adjudication of this writ petition are that the disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner. The Inquiry Officer submitted his report dated 20.12.2006 to the disciplinary authority. The respondent No.2 concurred with the inquiry report, dated 20.12.2006 and vide final order dated 17.1.2007 imposed the penalty of dismissal from service upon the petitioner. He preferred an appeal under Section 11 of the C.R.P.F. Act, 1949 read with Rule 28(a) and (e) of the C.R.P.F. Rules, 1955 before the Appellate Authority. The appeal was rejected by the Appellate Authority on 5th June, 2007. Mr. Vipirder Roach has strenuously argued that the appellate order Annexure P-11, dated 5th June, 2007 is not a reasoned order. He then contended that the Appellate Authority has not taken into consideration all the grounds mentioned in the appeal by the appellant.

2. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta has supported the order dated 5th June, 2007.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the pleadings and the record carefully. It is evident from Annexure P-10, i.e. appeal preferred by the petitioner that he has tak