SATYEN VAIDYA
S. B. Trading Company Through Its Partner – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. Through Its Principal Secretary IPH (Jal Shakti Vibhag) – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard. By way of instant petition, petitioner has prayed for following reliefs: -
b) Directing the respondent to hand over clear and hindrance free site for execution of the work.
c) Further restraining the respondent from initiating any action under clause 2&3, whereby imposing compensation and damages and also restraining the respondent from making recovery by forfeiting security, security deposits and from the pending payments under Agreement No. 160/2018-19 for the work (Providing L.I.S Horticulture Land from Changawati Khad to G.P. Kalbog Nagan and Ram Nagar) of the petitioner with the state of Himachal Pradesh till the determination of right and liabilities of the arbitration proceedings pertaining to No.160/2018 for the work.”
2. On 21st April, 2022 the following order was passed in the instant petition:-
Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record instructions dated 6.4.2022.
Let the petitioner provide clear roadmap with regard to the time schedule in which it would complete work in question as the same is already overdue.
In the meanwhile, responde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.