SATYEN VAIDYA
Roshni Devi, Wd/o. Late Sh. Jagat Ram, S/o. Sh. Khajana Ram – Appellant
Versus
Dolima Devi (deleted) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Appellant is in appeal against the judgment and decree dated 18.12.2006, passed by learned District Judge, Hamirpur, H.P. in Civil Appeal No. 10 of 2003, whereby the judgment and decree dated 30.12.2002, passed by learned Sub Judge, 1st Class, Barsar in Civil Suit No. 73/1998/92 has been reversed and the suit of the plaintiff has been dismissed.
2. Parties herein shall be referred by their names for the reason that due to long pendency of litigation, the original defendants have been substituted by number of legal representatives. Roshni Devi (appellant herein) was the plaintiff, whereas Khajana Ram and Man Chand were defendant No.1 and defendant No.2 respectively in civil suit before learned trial Court. Khajana Ram died and he was represented by his daughters Harbanso Devi and Narato Devi (respondents No. 2 and 3 before learned lower appellate Court). Man Chand was survived by legal representatives, who were the appellants before learned lower appellate Court.
4. Roshni Devi claimed herself to be wife of Jagat Ram, son of Khajana Ram (defendant No.1). Jagat Ram, husband of Roshni Devi had predeceased his father. Roshni Devi had filed Civil Suit No. 266 of 1992 against Kha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.