SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(HP) 469

SATYEN VAIDYA
PARVESH SHARMA S/O LATE SHRI V. K. SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
HIMACHAL PRADESH UNIVERSITY – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: P.P. CHAUHAN.
For the Respondent: SURENDER VERMA.

ORDER :

1. By way of instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for following substantive reliefs:

    (a) Quash the impugned orders A-1 and impugned order whereby the respondents have regularised the service of the respondent No. 5 (the copy being not available with the present applicant) and also quash the impugned inaction of the respondent department whereby the respondents are not regularizing the service of the applicant being arbitrary, malafide and illegal.

(b) Direct the respondent to regularize the service of the applicant against the post of Field Investigator/Field Assistant, w.e.f. the date on completion of 10 years of service or from the date his juniors respondents No. 4 and 5 have been regularised with all the consequential benefits and interest on the arrears @ 18% p.a. from the due date till the date of realization.

(c) Direct the respondents to re-engage the applicant against the same post at the same place in the same capacity with all the consequential benefits and granting him seniority ante-date.

2. The petitioner approached the erstwhile State Administrative Tri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top