SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(HP) 793

TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, VIRENDER SINGH
Reena Rathore – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sumeet Raj Sharma.
For the Respondents: Ashok Sharma, Rajinder Dogra, Vinod Thakur, Shiv Pal Manhans, Bhupinder Thakur.

JUDGMENT :

TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, J.

1. The instant petition has been filed for grant of the following substantive relief:

    “(i) that rejection of the second tendering process vide Annexure P-3 and P-4 may kindly be quashed and set aside and respondent be directed to declare the petitioner qualified in Technical Evaluation and open the financial bid of the petitioner.”

2. The petitioner is working and engaged in business of supplying of air conditioner refrigeration product along with its installation in government and private sector under the name of M/s Modern Cooling Solution and, thus, has been taking such contracts from government and private organizations. It is averred that the petitioner has extensive experience in the field of supplying and installing air conditioner refrigeration products in big commercial and government projects. The petitioner is duly enlisted with CPWD Haryana and Punjab Governments as a registered supplier and contractor and there is no such requirement as regards State of Himachal Pradesh.

3. It is further averred that respondent No. 2, on behalf of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top