VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Sumitra Devi – Appellant
Versus
Kapoor Chand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vivek Singh Thakur, J.
Petitioner, complainant in case No. 118-3 of 2013, titled as Sumitra Devi Vs. Kapoor Chand, filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short ‘NI Act’), has approached this Court against rejection of application filed by her for her reexamination, vide order dated 28.1.2020 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Anni, District Kullu, H.P. (Trial Court).
2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the material placed before me.
3. Petitioner has preferred a complaint under NI Act for dishonor of cheque issued by respondent Kapoor Chand for payment towards her salary, claiming that the said cheque was issued by respondent as Director of BHK construction Company. An affidavit in evidence, in examination-in-chief, has been filed by the petitioner and thereafter, she was subjected to cross-examination on behalf of respondent, wherein at one place she had admitted it to be correct that respondent was also an employee of the Company like her. At the Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes time of her cross-examination, no liberty was prayed by her counsel to re-exa
Rajaram Prasad Yadav Vs. State of Bihar and another
Jamatraj Kewalji Govani Vs. State of Maharashtra
U.T. of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and another Vs. Fatehsinh Mohansing Chauhan
Iddar and others Vs. Aabida and another
Acura Glass Tiles Enterprises V. S.S. Ray LawSuit (Del) 496
Mohanlal Shamji Soni Vs. Union of India
Rajendra Prasad Vs. Narcotic Cell
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.