Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Hoshiara – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant claims gift deed was fraudulently obtained. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defendant claims deed was voluntary. (Para 3) |
| 3. court issues framed to address fraud claims. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court upheld findings of lower courts. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. appeal dismissed; no substantial question of law. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT :
Ajay Mohan Goel, J.
By way of this Regular Second Appeal, the appellant assails the judgments and decrees passed by the learned Courts below, in terms whereof, the suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction filed by the appellant was dismissed and same was the fate of the appeal.
2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record of the case, which was called for by the Court, this Court does not finds any substantial question of law involved in this appeal. The suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction was filed by the appellant-plaintiff on the plea that the plaintiff was a rustic aged villager and the defendant requested and persuaded the plaintiff to Will his Natour land in his favour in lieu of maintaining the plaintiff and his wife throughout his life. According to the plaintiff, the defendant proved to b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
