SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(J&K) 256

A.K.GOEL, R.C.GANDHI
Kartar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of J. &K. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: B.D. Nayyar
Advocate For Respondent: Nemo

PER R.C. GANDHI, JUDGE:

1. This Letters patent Appeal is directed against an order dated 30-01-1999 passed in S.W.P No: 2273/98 whereby the learned Single Judge has disposed of the petition directing the respondents to take steps to fill up the posts of Agriculture Extension Officer substantively.

2. A few facts necessary for disposal of the appeal are: that the appellants, Junior Agriculture Assistants in the Agriculture Department, were put as in charge of the posts of Agriculture Extension Officer (AEO) on stop gap basis vide order dated 19-12-1995 issued by the respondent-State. This order was kept in abeyance on 26-12-1995. The appellants approached the Learned Single Judge seeking their continuation as Incharge AEOs. The Learned Single Judge vide order under appeal disposed of the writ petition observing that the policy of making ad hoc appointments has been deprecated by the Apex Court and accordingly issued directions for filling up the posts substantively, maintaining the impugned order dated 26-12-1995.

3. The appellants have challenged the order of the learned Single Judge on the ground that the same amounts to ousting the appellants without providing them an opportunity

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top