S.M.RIZVI, B.A.KHAN, A.M.MIR
Megha Enterprises And Etc. – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
These questions arise out of the applications filed by the appellants under Sec. 20 of the Arbitration Act seeking reference of some disputes to the arbitrator. The applications were resisted by the respondent-State on the plea of limitation and eventually rejected by the learned Single Judge as time barred vide judgment dated 29. 12. 1989. The matter went in appeal to the Division Bench, which has referred the following question "for authoritative pronouncement by the Full Bench:
"Whether Article 181 of the Limitation Act is applicable to applications filed under Sec. 20 of the Arbitration Act? "
Before we proceed to formulate our answer, we deem it appropriate to bring out the close similarity between the State Act of 1938 and the Central Act of 1908. One is the true copy of the other. Their preamble is identical and they™re other provisions similar. The preamble of both the Acts reads thus:
" Whereas it is exp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.