NISAR AHMAD KAKRU
Gh. Rasool Malik (Dr. ) – Appellant
Versus
State Of J. &K. – Respondent
"The petitioner, and learned counsel for the State were heard on 04.04.2001. However, it was adjourned to this day in hope of appearance of learned counsel for the petitioner. Counsel is not present. Mr.M.H.Attar submits that the petitioner has obtained an ad interim direction by supression of material facts. He, therefore, prays for vacation of the direction. One Dr. Gh.Nabi War has been posted in place of the petitioner as S.D.O. He submits that the interim directioin has the effect of staying his order of posting also. He, therefore, prays for modification of the order to enable him to join at Handwara in consequence to Govt. order No.91-ASH of 2000 dated: 15.09.2000. Considering the nature of the cont
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.