S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, JANKI NATH BHAT, JASWANT SINGH
Gh. Qadir – Appellant
Versus
Gh. Hussain – Respondent
2. The plaintiff respondent filed a suit for recovery of possession of 1 Kanal and 6 Marlas of land comprising Khasra No. 1850 in Tehsil Kishtwar. The proposed vendor. Qadus, executed an agreement to sell the land in dispute for a sum of Rs. 400 in favour of the appellant Ghulam Qadir. This agreement was executed on 21st Chet. 1998 (Bikrami). Possession of the land in dispute was delivered to the proposed vendee at the time of execution of the agreement. The proposed vendor Qadus received the entire consideration money of Rs. 400 but did not execute the sale deed. The present suit for possession was instituted on 17th Assuj, 2021 = 1-10-1964.
3. The suit was resisted by the defendant mainly on the ground that his possession under the agreement of sale became adverse from the date of its execution and therefore the defendant acquired title by adverse possession.
4. Both the Courts below have negatived the contention of the defendants but held that as the possession of the defend
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.