MIAN JALAL-UD-DIN
Kesho Nath Bakshi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
2. The petitioner has averred that he is a retired Government servant. He, in order to make his two ends meet applied for ejectment of tenants at will and protected ones on the ground of personal cultivation as provided under section 49 of the Jammu and Kashmir Tenancy Act of 1980. The case was being tried by the Assistant Commissioner Jammu when under an Ordinance followed by an Act in the Assembly the hearings in such cases were stayed in the year 1966. The stay proceedings for ejectment, it is averred, affects the fundamental rights of the petitioner in as much as it interfere with his rights to use the property and right to follow any occupation or trade and also the right to live. The order was passed maliciously in order to deprive the petitioner of his rights and this has created bad blood amongs the landlord and the tenants.
3. The State has file
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.