1. This revison petition is directed against the order of the 1st Additional Munsiff Srinagar dismissing the application of the petitioner under section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

2. Briefly speaking the facts of the case are that in a suit for rendition of accounts and dissolution of partnership brought by Prakash Chand the plaintiff respondent against Behari Lal the defendant petitioner the court initially passed certain orders on the applications filed by the plaintiff alongwith the suit. Notices were issued to the defendant to appear and file objections to these orders and also written statement in the case. The defendant appeared. He made a number of applications to the court for recalling these orders. He even sought time to file written statement as is evident from the two interlocutory orders of the court dated 25-5-76 and 9-6-76. Time was granted by the court for this purpose. However, on a subsequent date the defendant made an application under section 34 of the Arbitration Act asking the court to stay the proceedings in view of the Arbitration clause in the partnership deed. This application was resisted by the plaintiff on the ground that it was not maintainable and cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document