MIAN JALAL-UD-DIN
State Of J. &K. – Appellant
Versus
Sultan Guru – Respondent
2. The facts of the case have been set out in the aforesaid order of this court. Briefly speaking during the progress of trial of the case before the court of Sessions the prosecution sought transfer of the statement of the proseeutrix recorded by the committing court on the Sessions file on the ground that the proseeutrix was not traceable despite the fact that efforts were made to locate her whereabouts. This request of the prosecution was vehemently opposed by the accused on the ground that the statement of the witness had not been duly recorded by the Committing Magistrate in accordance with Sec. 356 and Sec. 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as the statement was not signed by the Magistrate and also it was not accompanied by an authenticated vernacular translation of the evidence given by the witness in English. The Session Judge upheld the objection and refused to transfer the statement on the records. Thereafter the matter came up in revision b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.