SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(J&K) 44

MIAN JALAL-UD-DIN
State Of J. &K. – Appellant
Versus
Sultan Guru – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: A.K. Malik
Advocate For Respondent: M.L. Qureshi

1. This is a petition under Article 134 (1) (c) of the Constitution of India for grant of certificate of fitness for filing an appeal before the Supreme Court of India against the judgment and order dated 22-4-1977 of this court.

2. The facts of the case have been set out in the aforesaid order of this court. Briefly speaking during the progress of trial of the case before the court of Sessions the prosecution sought transfer of the statement of the proseeutrix recorded by the committing court on the Sessions file on the ground that the proseeutrix was not traceable despite the fact that efforts were made to locate her whereabouts. This request of the prosecution was vehemently opposed by the accused on the ground that the statement of the witness had not been duly recorded by the Committing Magistrate in accordance with Sec. 356 and Sec. 360 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as the statement was not signed by the Magistrate and also it was not accompanied by an authenticated vernacular translation of the evidence given by the witness in English. The Session Judge upheld the objection and refused to transfer the statement on the records. Thereafter the matter came up in revision b




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top