SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(J&K) 38

JANKI NATH BHAT
Ali Bagban – Appellant
Versus
Gh. Mohi-ud-Din Ahangar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: M.L. Qureshi
Advocate For Respondent: Lok Nath Sharma

The learned Sessions Judge Srinagar has made this reference with the recommendation that the entire proceedings under Ss. 145/107 Criminal P. C. launched by Ghulam Mohi-ud-Din against Ali Bagban and others before the A D.M Srinagar be quashed.

It appears that an application under Ss.145/107 Crim. P C. was presented by the said Ghulam Mohi-ud-Din before the A.D.M Srinagar wherein he named correctly Ali Bagban and his son Ghulam Mohd. Bagban The parentage of a few other non-applicants was not mentioned in the application. The application stated that Ghulam Mohi-ud-Din was the owner of a three storied building (which contained a shop) situate at Safakadal. Ali Bagban was the tenant of this shop but he had surrendered his tenancy a few days earlier. Later on two days prior to the presentation of the application all the non-applicants took forcible possession of the shop which created a danger to public peace. It was prayed that proceedings under Ss. 107/145 Criminal P. C be taken against the non-applicants. A separate application for attachment of this shop was presented to the court on the same day, i.e. 14-1-63. Some clerk in the A.D.Ms Court recorded the statement of the applicant Gh













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top