SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(J&K) 119

B.L.BHAT
Munish Arora – Appellant
Versus
Monika Arora – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Anil Sethi
Advocate For Respondent: L.K. Sharma

B.L. Bhat, J.

1. Munish Arora, Lalita Arora, Rohit Arora, Shikha Arora, Smt. Archana Gulati, and Suman Gulati who figure as accused in a criminal complaint titled as Mrs. Monika Arora v. Munish Arora and Ors. for offences under Section 498-A RPC, 403 and 406 RPC pending decision before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jammu have through the medium of the petition under Section 561-A Cr. P.C. sought indulgence of this Court for quashment of this criminal complaint and also order dated 27.10.2002 recorded therein by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jammu by virtue of which cognizance of the offence has been taken for the said offences and process came to be issued against the petitioners.

2. It appears that on 22.9.2001, the respondent namely Monika Arora came to lodge report before the Station House Officer, Police Station Women Cell at Jammu alleging therein that petitioner/accused after hatching a criminal conspiracy misrepresented that accused No. 1 is potent when in fact he is impotent induced her to marry accused respondent No. 1. That after marriage the petitioner/accused harassed her by administered her physical beating finally turned out her from their house after









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top