S.M.RIZVI
Naba Lone – Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate – Respondent
2. The respondent/detaining authority has filed his counter affidavit.
3.Heared learned counsil for the parties.
4. The ground No : 1 is very vague and has no nexus with the object sought to be achieved, in detaining the detenue. Because the detenue happens to be a resident of a village which is surrounded by forests does not necessarily mean that he was a timber smuggler.
5. The ground No : 2 also suffers from the same vice as ground No : 1. When was the detenue feeling the trees and in which forest, is not mentioned ? which were his hideouts where he used to conceal the said timber is not indicated ? who were the poor labourers whom he engaged to fell and transport the said timber, is not stated anywhere?
6 The ground No : 3 is also very vague and also non-existent and irrelevant.
7. As regards ground No ; 4, a criminal ca
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.