SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(J&K) 72

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
R.P. Sethi, J.
Om Parkash - Appellant
Versus
State Of J&K & Anr. - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 91/1982
Decided On : 08 April, 1988

Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: T.S.Thakur
Advocate For Respondent: B.S. Manhas

Service conditions of civil servants are regulated by statutory rules having the sanction of law and cannot be altered, modified, or changed adversely affecting the rights of civil servants in service on the basis of orders passed by any functionary of the executive without proper legal sanction.

Headnote:

CONSTABLE PROMOTION - J&K POLICE RULES, 1960 - RULE 385 - SELECTION GRADE CONSTABLES - CREATION OF CATEGORY - PROMOTION TO HEAD CONSTABLE JUNIOR GRADE - CONDITIONS - INTERPRETATION OF RULES - VALIDITY OF ORDERS - RIGHT TO CONSIDERATION FOR PROMOTION.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner, a constable, challenged the orders creating the category of selection grade constables and providing for their promotion to Head Constable Junior Grade, bypassing the claims of constables meeting the minimum qualification under Rule 385 of the J&K Police Manual.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the orders creating the category of selection grade constables and providing for their promotion to Head Constable Junior Grade were without legal authority and liable to be quashed as they were in contravention of the statutory provisions of Rule 385 of the J&K Police Manual.

Issues: 1. Whether the respondent had the jurisdiction to pass the impugned orders overriding the provisions of Rule 385 of the J&K Police Rules? 2. Whether the creation of the category of selection grade constables and their promotion to Head Constable Junior Grade was valid?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the respondent did not have the jurisdiction to pass the impugned orders as they were intended to override the provisions of Rule 385 of the J&K Police Rules, which have statutory force and govern the service conditions of police personnel. 2. The court held that the creation of the category of selection grade constables and their promotion to Head Constable Junior Grade was not valid as it was not provided for in the rules and could not be done by an executive order.

Final Decision: The court quashed the impugned orders and directed the respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of Head Constable Junior Grade retrospectively from the date he was eligible for promotion, with notional promotion and consequential prospective benefits.

1 Respondent No. 2 vide order No: 236 of 1974 dated 30-3-1974, annexure A partially modified CPO Order No; 167 of 1974 dated 7-2-1974 regarding the promotion to the post of constable selection grade by providing that half the number of selection grade posts available in each unit will be given to constable with a long me-ritorous service for which all constables were to be considered strictly in order of their seniority & selection grades awarded in that order subject to reduction of the merit. It was further provided that the other 50% of selection grades would be awarded on the basis of competition test marking system as already prescribed by rule 385 of J&K police Manual. The candidates were also required to be tested in a parade for which only 10 numbers were allowed. Constable with one years service who had passed their recruits training course were deemed to be eligible for the test. It was further provided that those found suitable would be brought on re-designated list A & promoted to the selection grades as vacancies occur. The system of promotion to the rank of constables & others promotions of list C was not to be charged. Selection grade constables were to constitute a rung in the ladder of promotions to the rank of Head Constable only after all selection grade posts are filled in after four years, till then every constable selection grade or otherwise who had five years was held eligible for list C. The Departmental promotion committee for list A and promotion to the selection grades was to be constituted by the Superintendents of police commandants themselves. Vide order No; 720 of1978 dated 11.11.1978, it was provided that in supersession of all previous orders on the subject of preparation of list A & C in the police department, the rules and guidelines prescribed vide the aforesaid order \annexure B" shall be followed. According to this order for list A, all the constables who had completed five years of service and had successfully passed the KTD at PTS Udhampur examinations and were in a position to read and write simple urdu sentences and english numeral were deemed to be eligible for the test. It also provided the marking system For list C it was provided that all selection grade constables with eight years total service including the service as constable were to de deemed eligible to be brought on list C. The test marking system for List A was also to apply for list C. No selection grade constables was to be promoted to the rank of Head constable until he had passed lower school course from the PTC Phillaur. 10% posts in the rank of head constables were reserved for aged selection grade constables & their names were to be inserted in the list on the basis of the seniority except in a case where the senior was considered due to his bad record. Five major punishments were deemed to be a disqualification. It was further provided that D. P. Cs would be constituted for both the lists by the Superintendents of police/ Commandants and all eligible constables/ selection grade constables Were to be called for test/interview and the list so prepare as not to exceed the number of vacancies which were likely to occur within the next 18 months. Feeling aggrieved of the aforesaid orders, the petitioner presented this writ petition on 24-2-1982 mainly on the ground that the impugned orders having been passed in contravention of the statutory provisions, were liable to be quashed It was submitted that the respondent No; 2 did not have the jurisdiction to the aforesaid impugned orders, as these were intended to over-ride the provisions of rule 385 of the J&K police Rules . It is submitted that under rule 383 any constable who can read and write simple urdu sentences and english numerals with a clear characterial was entitled to be considered for promotion to he Head Constable juni







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top