IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
Permod Kohli, J.
Nissar Hussain & Ors. - Appellant
Versus
State Of J&K & Ors. - Respondent
OWP Nos. 1426/1992 And 202/1992
Decided On : 28 May, 2003
Land Acquisition - Agrarian Reforms Act - Circular No. Rev(LB) 10/80 - Section 8(4) of Agrarian Reforms Act
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners claimed compensation for land acquired by the State Government, which was apportioned to private respondents based on Circular No. Rev(LB) 10/80. The petitioners argued that only the original owners are entitled to compensation under the Land Acquisition Act and Section 8(4) of the Agrarian Reforms Act supports their claim.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners, as the original owners, are entitled to compensation for the acquired land, and the circular cannot supplant the statutory provision of Section 8(4) of the Agrarian Reforms Act. The court directed the respondents to pay compensation to the petitioners and allowed them to seek a reference for the quantum of compensation.
Issues: The issues revolved around the entitlement to compensation for acquired land under the Land Acquisition Act and the Agrarian Reforms Act, and the validity of Circular No. Rev(LB) 10/80 in apportioning compensation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that Section 8(4) of the Agrarian Reforms Act clearly states that only the original owners are entitled to compensation for acquired land, and the circular cannot override this statutory provision.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petitions, directed the respondents to pay compensation to the petitioners, and granted the petitioners the right to seek a reference for the quantum of compensation.
2. Land described above became subject matter of acquisition by the State Government and on completion of the acquisition proceedings award dated 29.10.1985 was passed. A sum of Rs. 32,640 was determined as compensation per kanal for the acquired land. Petitioners share in the acquired land is indicated in para No. 3 of the petition.
3. Respondents 4 to 15 were tenants under the petitioners and recorded as such in the Revenue record. Proceedings under Section 4 of the Agrarian Reforms Act were initiated wherein respondents 4 to 15 were shown as prospective owner in respect to the land owned by the petitioners. While considering the question of compensation payable for the land in question acquired by the respondents for public purposes, the Collector apportioned the amount of compensation amongst petitioners and private respondents on the basis of a circular No. REV(LV) 10/80, dated 23.2.1980. This circular which has been issued by the Additional Secretary to Government, Revenue Department deals with the question of apportionment of compensation to be awarded under the Land Acquisition Act amongst various categories of persons. In respect to land subject matter of Agrarian Reforms Act and where proceedings under Section 4 have been completed or pending the circular provides that the entire compensation be paid to the prospective owner and only levy to the ex-owners. Relevant portion of the circular reads as under:-
"It has been considered necessary to revise the circular instructions regarding appointment of compensation to be awarded under the J&K Land Acquisition Act SVT/1990 in the light of J&K Agrarian Reforms Act, 1976 issued vide this office endorsement No. Rev(LAJ/15/73, dt. 8/79. Accordingly, the following guidelines are issued in suppression of all previous instructions on the subject, for strict compliance:--
.........................
.........................
Where the rights of an owner in land under acquisition have been extinguished and vested in the State under section 4 of the Act of 1976 and declaration under section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act has been issued after Ist May, 1973 and the prospective owner of the said land has not acquired ownership rights until the date of such declaration the appointment of compensation of such land shall be made in the manner indicated below, keeping in view the conditions laid down in paras 5 and 6.
(i) Where the rent recoverable from a prospective owner is equivalent to the village, rate (Nadi Hasbi Partah-Deh) with or without Malikana, the ex-owner will be paid the amount equivalent to twenty times of such land revenue, the remaining amount of compensation being paid to the prospective owner after deducting 10% as administration charges, to be assessed on the amount payable to ex-owner. This amount will be credited to the Govt. Exchequer under the appropriate head of account.
(ii) Where the respective owner was an occupancy tenant in Kharif, 1971 paying rent other than the rent mentioned in sub-para (i) above the ex-owner be paid the amount with the provisions of part "A" of Schedule III of the Act 1976. The remaining amount of compensation will be paid to the prospective owner after deducting 10% as administration charge to be assessed on the amount payable to the ex-owner. This amount will be credited to the Govt. Exchequer under the appropriate head of account.
(iii) Where are ex-owner has not exercised the option of resumption of land or where the ex-owner is not found.
(iv) Eligible to resume the land, the procedure laid down in sub-para (ii) above will apply in this case also.
..............
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.