SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(J&K) 340

T.S.DOABIA, B.L.BHAT
Gh. Hassan Wani – Appellant
Versus
State Of J. &K. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: M.A. Qayoom
Advocate For Respondent: R. Gadda

Per T.S. Doabia, J (Oral):

The present appellant, who figured as writ petitioner, applied for permission to construct a building. This permission was granted to him on 2nd January, by the Administrator, Notified Area Committee, Pulwama. This order makes a mention of the fact that the sanction is being granted in terms of section 10 of the Jammu and Kashmir Town Planning Act, 1963 and Section 222 of the Municipal Act, Svt. 2008. The fact that Tehsildar, Pulwama, had made a recommendation vide his communication dated 8.3.2001 was taken note of. The communications addressed by the Executive Engineer, R&B Division dated 11.4.2001 and of the District Town Planner dated 14th June, 2001 were also taken note of. It was on the basis of communications so received, sanction was accorded for erection of shop/residential house. The terms and conditions have been specified. Condition Nos. 6, 7, 8 and 9 indicate the method and manner in which the construction has to be raised. For facility of reference these conditions No. 6, 7, 8 and 9 are reproduced below:--

6. The wall from the side of NAC land should be blind.

7. The front side set back, shall be maintained 20 from the plot line.

8. Rear side 15















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top