SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(J&K) 273

B.L.BHAT
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Ram Nath – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: Romesh Arora
Advocate For Respondent: S.C. Gupta

This Civil Revision is directed against the order dated 17.7.2002 recorded by the learned Additional District Judge, Jammu in Civil Appeal titled as Union of India & Ors, v. Ram Nath. It is taken up for final disposal and adjudication with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.

2. It appears that the plaintiff-respondent came to file a suit for permanent prohibitory injuction against the defendants-petitioners to the effect that defendant No. 1 and its subordinate officers-defendants No. 2 to 5 be permanently restrained to interfere with the land measuring about 89 kanals 2 marlas comprising of Survey No. 122-min, 131-min, 133-min, 101, 103, 111, 114, 115, 108, 113, 116, 105, 109, 106, 107, 104 and 110 located at village Deeli Tehsil Jammu which is in peaceful possession of the plaintiff and one Bansi Lal who have purchased 40 kanals 8 marlas out of this land by virtue of sale deeds dated 20.1.2000, 29.3.2000, 25.4.2000 and 8.8.2000 and the remaining land of 48 kanals 14 marlas stands leased out to them jointly for a period of 83 years by the land owners vide lease deeds dated 29.3.2000, 6.4.2000 and 8.4.2000. Alongside this suit, an application for issuance of temporary in








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top