SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(J&K) 257

Y.P.NARGOTRA
T. R. Kalra – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Advocate For Appellant: R.P. Bakshi
Advocate For Respondent: B.S. Salathia

"Whether a Magistrate can on taking cognizance, implead a person as an accused in a case in which such person has not been arrayed as an accused by the investigating agency on the basis of record of the investigation submitted under sec.173 Cr.P.C.," is the question arising for determination in this criminal revision.

2. The petitioner was Director General of Prisons J&K and in connection with purchase of medicines for the jail inmates during the years 1991-1992 a case was registered by the Vigilance Organization for commission of offence under sec.5(2) P.C.Act, read with sec. 120.B RPC. The investigating agency found the commisssion of the said offences by the accused which included the petitioner and the case was submitted to the Government for according sanction under sec.6 of the P.C.Act. The Government after examining the case declined to accord sanction in respect of the petitioner but accorded sanction for the trial of other accused named in the F.I.R. Consequently a charge sheet for trial of the accused for whom the Government had accorded sanction was filed before the learned Special Judge Anti-Corruption Jammu. In the charge sheet the petitioner Sh.T.R.Kalra was not arraye


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top